OffTarget

Observed issues › gcc/gcc-acc-detach-delete-attach-underflow

Appears to behave incorrectlyRun-time error · Fortran · OpenACC · Open

OpenACC: exit data delete after exit data detach stops with "attach count underflow"

Legality: independently confirmed. One independent reading was uncertain; 2 adjudicating readings that weighed both find the program legal and the result required: The attach and detach clauses accept Fortran allocatable variables, which suggests allocatable components count as pointer references. But the attach pointer action is defined only for a pointer reference, and that term is never defined. Whether copyin(h%v) sets the attachment counter to one is therefore not settled. How this is checked

After exit data detach of an attached member pointer, exit data delete of its target should leave the attachment counter at zero and free the data. GCC 16.2's libgomp stops the program instead with "attach count underflow" (exit 1), in Fortran and C, on the MI250X and the A100; without the detach the same program runs correctly. OpenACC 2.6, the version GCC documents, says a detach action at a zero attachment counter takes no action.

Affected variants

CompilerMI300A gfx942
unified memory (XNACK 1)
MI300A gfx942
copy (XNACK 0)
MI250X gfx90a
copy (XNACK 0)
MI300X gfx942
copy (XNACK 0)
MI350X gfx950
copy (XNACK 0)
A100 sm_80
separate memory
A100 sm_80
managed memory
AFAR 24.3.0n/an/an/an/an/an/an/a
CCE 19.0.0correctcorrectunknown
not run
unknown
not run
unknown
not run
n/an/a
CCE 20.0.2correctcorrectunknown
not run
unknown
not run
unknown
not run
n/an/a
CCE 21.0.3correctcorrectunknown
not run
unknown
not run
unknown
not run
n/an/a
CCE 21.0.4correctcorrectunknown
not run
unknown
not run
unknown
not run
n/an/a
NVHPC 25.11n/an/an/an/an/acorrectcorrect
NVHPC 26.9n/an/an/an/an/acorrectcorrect
GCC 16.2.0behaves incorrectlybehaves incorrectlybehaves incorrectlybehaves incorrectlybehaves incorrectlybehaves incorrectlyn/a

"behaves incorrectly" / "not supported": this issue, confirmed in up to four environments (another build directory, another node, a repeat). "fails another way": a different failure, not counted as this issue. "unknown": not run there, or the runs disagree.

Messages

ResultCompiler and GPUMessage
behaves incorrectlyGCC 16.2.0, MI300A unified
GCC 16.2.0, MI300A copy
GCC 16.2.0, MI250X
GCC 16.2.0, MI300X
GCC 16.2.0, MI350X
GCC 16.2.0, A100 separate
show
libgomp: attach count underflow

Reproduce

GCC 16.2.0, MI300A unified

export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$GCC_16_2/lib64:/opt/rocm-7.2.1/lib
$GCC_16_2/bin/gfortran -fopenacc -foffload=amdgcn-amdhsa -foffload-options=amdgcn-amdhsa=-march=gfx942 -O2 repro.f90 -o repro
HSA_XNACK=1 ./repro

GCC 16.2.0, A100 separate

export PATH=/usr/local/cuda/bin:$PATH
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$GCC_16_2/lib64
$GCC_16_2/bin/gfortran -fopenacc -foffload=nvptx-none -foffload-options=nvptx-none=-march=sm_80 -foffload-options=nvptx-none=-latomic -O2 repro.f90 -o repro
./repro

CCE 19.0.0, MI300A unified (runs correctly)

module load cce/19.0.0 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm/6.4.3
module unload cray-mpich
ftn -h acc -O2 repro.f90 -o repro
HSA_XNACK=1 ./repro
Program (58 lines)
! # Finding (GCC 16.2): OpenACC exit data detach, then exit data delete: "attach count underflow"
!
! - toolchains: gcc_g90 (GCC 16.2.0, AMD Instinct MI250X gfx90a, Tioga) and gcc_sm80 (GCC 16.2.0,
!   NVIDIA A100 sm_80, wingtip); separate memory only; -O2; OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory
! - build: gfortran -fopenacc -foffload=amdgcn-amdhsa -foffload-options=amdgcn-amdhsa=-march=gfx90a -O2 (gcc_g90);
!   -foffload=nvptx-none -foffload-options=nvptx-none=-march=sm_80 -foffload-options=nvptx-none=-latomic -O2 (gcc_sm80)
! - failure: run_error: attach count underflow
! - observed: `libgomp: attach count underflow` and exit 1 at the exit data delete, in every run on both GPUs (this file: gcc_sm80
!   and gcc_g90, 5 of 5 each with OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD mandatory and 5 of 5 unset; results/gcc/<tc>/probes-findings.jsonl); the
!   parallel loop before it ran on the device.
! - expected: `sum= 2144`, then `RESULT ran_on_host=0 check=pass`
! - rule: in OpenACC 2.6, the version GCC documents, the delete clause performs a detach action, and "If the current device is a
!   shared memory device, or if var is not present on the device, or if the attachment counter for var for the pointer is zero, no
!   action is taken. Otherwise, the attachment counter for the pointer var is decremented" (OpenACC 2.6, section 2.7.2 "Detach
!   Action", margin lines 1115-1122; the same sentence in OpenACC 3.0, 3.2 and 3.3, the last at margin lines 1710-1711). After exit
!   data detach the attachment counter is zero, so the delete leaves it alone. OpenACC 3.4 rewords the actions with the same intent:
!   the delete clause performs a decrement counter action on the attachment counter (OpenACC 3.4 §2.7.12 l.2022-2025), "If the
!   reference counter is already zero, its value is left unchanged" (§2.7.2 l.1733-1735), and a detach pointer action at a zero
!   counter is defined (§2.7.2 l.1794-1796); the data clause errors (§2.7.3) name no attachment-counter error.
! - same-compiler control (correct: `sum= 2144`, 5 of 5 runs on each GPU): the same program without the exit data detach
!   (controls/gcc-acc{,-c}-detach-control.{f90,c}).
! - other families: CCE 19/20/21 (Fortran, MI300A and MI250X) and NVHPC 25.11/26.9 (both languages, separate and managed memory) run
!   the catalog programs acc34-clause-detach and acc34-c-clause-detach to the end (their check cannot see the detach: unobservable).
!   The site's finding matrix runs this file on every compiler.
! - gate and confirmer: 2 cells (1 gcc_g90, 1 gcc_sm80), each confirmed in the gate's four environments (a-d;
!   results/gcc/gate-tioga/ and gate-wingtip/ verdicts.jsonl); confirmer verdicts (results/gcc/confirm/batch.gcc_*.jsonl):
!   needs_human (R22-expected-weak) 2
! - catalog programs (1): acc34-clause-detach
! - legality: read against the spec (the rule above); the catalog programs of the list are legal by construction
!   (offload.engine.gen,
!   c_gen and acc_gen; no compiler). GCC is a compiler under test only and never a legality witness.
program detach_then_delete
  use openacc, only: acc_device_host, acc_on_device
  implicit none
  integer, parameter :: n = 64
  type :: holder
    integer, allocatable :: v(:)
  end type holder
  type(holder) :: h
  integer :: b(n)
  integer :: i, host_flag
  allocate(h%v(n))
  h%v = 1
  b = 0
  host_flag = 1
  !$acc enter data copyin(h)
  !$acc enter data copyin(h%v)
  !$acc parallel loop copyout(b) copy(host_flag) present(h)
  do i = 1, n
    if (i == 1) host_flag = merge(1, 0, acc_on_device(acc_device_host))
    b(i) = i + h%v(i)
  end do
  !$acc exit data detach(h%v)
  !$acc exit data delete(h%v)
  !$acc exit data delete(h)
  print '(a,i0)', 'sum= ', sum(b)
  print '(a,i0,a,a)', 'RESULT ran_on_host=', host_flag, ' check=', merge('pass', 'fail', sum(b) == 2144)
end program detach_then_delete

Source in the repository

Something to add? Dispute its legality · Report it fixed in a newer release · Report a mistake on this page

Expected and observed

Expected

sum= 2144

Observed where it behaves incorrectly

libgomp: attach count underflow

What the specification requires

The specification text this program relies on and the compiler is expected to support.

OpenACC 3.4 §2.7.12

OpenACC 3.4 §2.7.2

If the reference counter is already zero, its value is left unchanged

OpenACC 3.4 §2.7.2

OpenACC 3.4 §2.7.3

Evidence

Same compiler, one change

  • the same program without the exit data detach: not run yet
    Control program
    program delete_only
      use openacc, only: acc_device_host, acc_on_device
      implicit none
      integer, parameter :: n = 64
      type :: holder
        integer, allocatable :: v(:)
      end type holder
      type(holder) :: h
      integer :: b(n)
      integer :: i, host_flag
      allocate(h%v(n))
      h%v = 1
      b = 0
      host_flag = 1
      !$acc enter data copyin(h)
      !$acc enter data copyin(h%v)
      !$acc parallel loop copyout(b) copy(host_flag) present(h)
      do i = 1, n
        if (i == 1) host_flag = merge(1, 0, acc_on_device(acc_device_host))
        b(i) = i + h%v(i)
      end do
      !$acc exit data delete(h%v)
      !$acc exit data delete(h)
      print '(a,i0)', 'sum= ', sum(b)
      print '(a,i0,a,a)', 'RESULT ran_on_host=', host_flag, ' check=', merge('pass', 'fail', sum(b) == 2144)
    end program delete_only
    

Other compilers run it correctly

CCE 19.0.0, CCE 20.0.2, CCE 21.0.3, CCE 21.0.4, NVHPC 25.11, NVHPC 26.9

Reproducers of this issue