Observed issues › cce21-in-reduction-assumed-shape-write-lost
Appears to behave incorrectlyWrong answer · Fortran · OpenMP · Open · regression
ftn 21: writes to an assumed-shape dummy in a target region with in_reduction are lost
Legality: independently confirmed. 2 independent readings find the program legal and the result required. How this is checked
Affected variants
| Compiler | MI300A gfx942 unified memory (XNACK 1) | MI300A gfx942 copy (XNACK 0) | MI250X gfx90a copy (XNACK 0) | MI300X gfx942 copy (XNACK 0) | MI350X gfx950 copy (XNACK 0) | A100 sm_80 separate memory | A100 sm_80 managed memory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFAR 24.3.0 | correct | correct | unknown not run | correct | correct | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 19.0.0 | correct | correct | unknown not run | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 20.0.2 | correct | correct | unknown not run | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 21.0.3 | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | unknown not run | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 21.0.4 | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | unknown not run | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| NVHPC 25.11 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | fails another way | fails another way |
| NVHPC 26.9 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | fails another way | fails another way |
| GCC 16.2.0 | fails another way | fails another way | fails another way | fails another way | fails another way | fails another way | n/a |
"behaves incorrectly" / "not supported": this issue, confirmed in up to four environments (another build directory, another node, a repeat). "fails another way": a different failure, not counted as this issue. "unknown": not run there, or the runs disagree.
Messages
| Result | Compiler and GPU | Message |
|---|---|---|
| behaves incorrectly | CCE 21.0.3, MI300A unified CCE 21.0.3, MI300A copy CCE 21.0.4, MI300A unified CCE 21.0.4, MI300A copy | showr= 3 y(16)= 0 |
| fails another way | NVHPC 25.11, A100 separate NVHPC 25.11, A100 managed | showNVFORTRAN-S-0034-Syntax error at or near identifier task_reduction (site-cce21-in-reduction-assumed-shape-write-lost.f90: 50) NVFORTRAN-S-0034-Syntax error at or near identifier in_reduction (site-cce21-in-reduction-assumed-shape-write-lost.f90: 51) NVFORTRAN/x86-64 Linux 25.11-0: compilation completed with severe errors |
| fails another way | NVHPC 26.9, A100 separate NVHPC 26.9, A100 managed | showNVFORTRAN-S-0034-Syntax error at or near identifier task_reduction (site-cce21-in-reduction-assumed-shape-write-lost.f90: 50) NVFORTRAN-S-0034-Syntax error at or near identifier in_reduction (site-cce21-in-reduction-assumed-shape-write-lost.f90: 51) NVFORTRAN/x86-64 Linux 26.9-0: compilation completed with severe errors |
| fails another way | GCC 16.2.0, MI300A unified GCC 16.2.0, MI300A copy GCC 16.2.0, MI250X GCC 16.2.0, MI300X GCC 16.2.0, MI350X GCC 16.2.0, A100 separate | showlibgomp: OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD is set to MANDATORY, but device not found |
Reproduce
CCE 21.0.3, MI300A unified
module load cce/21.0.3 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm/7.2.0 module unload cray-mpich ftn -fopenmp -O2 repro.f90 -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
CCE 21.0.4, MI300A unified
module load cce/21.0.4 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm/7.2.0 module unload cray-mpich ftn -fopenmp -O2 repro.f90 -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
AFAR 24.3.0, MI300A unified (runs correctly)
$AFAR/bin/amdflang -fopenmp --offload-arch=gfx942 -O2 repro.f90 -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
Program (58 lines)
! (reducing the reproduction gate's flagged case entry
! 48, fuzz x0-alloc:197, whose kernel 4 is this pattern): CCE 21 loses the
! writes to an assumed-shape dummy array in a target region that has
! in_reduction (in a taskgroup with task_reduction), inside the procedure
! whose dummy it is. With explicit-shape dummies, or without the
! task_reduction/in_reduction pair, the writes come back.
! Spec: y is a mappable list item mapped tofrom (5.2 §5.8.3 p.150; the only
! Fortran list-item restriction, p.156, is on assumed-size arrays), so its
! values at the end of the region are assigned back to the original; the
! in_reduction clause on target (§5.5.10 p.138) and task_reduction on
! taskgroup (§5.5.9 p.137) do not change the mapping of other list items. r
! is not updated in the region. Expected: "r= 3 y(16)= 32".
! Observed (Tuolumne MI300A, -O2, OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory, 3 runs per
! cell, 2026-10-26; data/evidence/gate_probe/logs/reduce.txt, ids r2/inred_noh*):
! CCE 21.0.3 at HSA_XNACK 0 and 1: "r= 3 y(16)= 0" in every run.
! One-change controls of this program (after the later
! runs; data/evidence/gate_probe/reduce/): x(n), y(n) explicit-shape
! (inred_noh_explicit.f90) and the taskgroup and in_reduction removed
! (inred_noh_noinred.f90) each give "r= 3 y(16)= 32" in 6 of 6 runs on
! CCE 21, XNACK 0 and 1. CCE 19.0.0 and 20.0.2: right (both crash on the
! fuller fuzz kernel instead: data/reports/gate-queue.md, entry 48). The
! fix-round-1 form, which also printed an unwritten scalar h, gave the same
! (inred_host_noh.f90), and so did a form that writes and maps h
! (inred_host.f90).
! With r updated in the region (r = r + x(i)) CCE 21 does not link it
! ("undefined symbol: _cray$mt_taskwait": cce21-in-reduction-taskwait-link.f90),
! so this program leaves r alone.
! Another family: AFAR amdflang: "r= 3 y(16)= 32" (XNACK 0 and 1). NVHPC
! nvfortran 25.11 and 26.9 reject task_reduction ("Syntax error at or near
! identifier task_reduction" on data/evidence/gate_probe/reduce/unh_k2.f90 and
! unh_k4.f90, data/evidence/gate_probe/logs/wingtip5.log), so it is no witness.
! CCE: ftn -fopenmp -O2 (module load cce/21.0.3 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm)
! Run: OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory HSA_XNACK=0 ./a.out
program p
implicit none
integer, parameter :: n = 16
integer :: a(n), b(n), r, i
do i = 1, n
a(i) = i
b(i) = 0
end do
r = 3
call k(a, b)
print '(a,i0,a,i0)', 'r= ', r, ' y(16)= ', b(n)
contains
subroutine k(x, y)
integer, intent(in) :: x(:)
integer, intent(inout) :: y(:)
integer :: i
!$omp taskgroup task_reduction(+: r)
!$omp target map(to: x) map(tofrom: y) in_reduction(+: r)
do i = 1, n
y(i) = 2 * x(i)
end do
!$omp end target
!$omp end taskgroup
end subroutine k
end program p
Something to add? Dispute its legality · Report it fixed in a newer release · Report a mistake on this page
Expected and observed
Expected
r= 3 y(16)= 32
Observed where it behaves incorrectly
r= 3 y(16)= 0
What the specification requires
The specification text this program relies on and the compiler is expected to support.
OpenMP 5.2 §5.8.3 p.150
OpenMP 5.2 §5.5.10 p.138
OpenMP 5.2 §5.5.9 p.137
Evidence
Other compilers run it correctly
AFAR 24.3.0