Observed issues › catalog/cce-c-dist-schedule-chunk
Appears to behave incorrectlyWrong answer · C · OpenMP · Open
craycc: dist_schedule(static, 4) on target teams distribute parallel for puts every iteration on team 0
Legality: independently confirmed. 2 independent readings find the program legal and the result required. How this is checked
Affected variants
| Compiler | MI300A gfx942 unified memory (XNACK 1) | MI300A gfx942 copy (XNACK 0) | MI250X gfx90a copy (XNACK 0) | MI300X gfx942 copy (XNACK 0) | MI350X gfx950 copy (XNACK 0) | A100 sm_80 separate memory | A100 sm_80 managed memory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFAR 24.3.0 | correct | correct | correct | correct | correct | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 19.0.0 | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 20.0.2 | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 21.0.3 | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| CCE 21.0.4 | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | behaves incorrectly | unknown not run | unknown not run | n/a | n/a |
| NVHPC 25.11 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | fails another way | fails another way |
| NVHPC 26.9 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | fails another way | fails another way |
| GCC 16.2.0 | correct | correct | correct | correct | correct | correct | n/a |
"behaves incorrectly" / "not supported": this issue, confirmed in up to four environments (another build directory, another node, a repeat). "fails another way": a different failure, not counted as this issue. "unknown": not run there, or the runs disagree.
Messages
| Result | Compiler and GPU | Message |
|---|---|---|
| behaves incorrectly | CCE 19.0.0, MI300A unified CCE 19.0.0, MI300A copy CCE 19.0.0, MI250X CCE 20.0.2, MI300A unified CCE 20.0.2, MI300A copy CCE 20.0.2, MI250X CCE 21.0.3, MI300A unified CCE 21.0.3, MI300A copy CCE 21.0.3, MI250X CCE 21.0.4, MI300A unified CCE 21.0.4, MI300A copy CCE 21.0.4, MI250X | showRESULT ran_on_host=0 check=fail |
| fails another way | NVHPC 25.11, A100 separate NVHPC 25.11, A100 managed NVHPC 26.9, A100 separate NVHPC 26.9, A100 managed | showCompilation terminated. cleaning up after signal(15)... |
Reproduce
CCE 19.0.0, MI300A unified
module load cce/19.0.0 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm/6.4.3 module unload cray-mpich craycc -fopenmp -fopenmp-targets=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -Xopenmp-target=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -march=gfx942 -fopenmp-version=52 -O2 repro.c -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
CCE 20.0.2, MI300A unified
module load cce/20.0.2 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm/6.4.3 module unload cray-mpich craycc -fopenmp -fopenmp-targets=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -Xopenmp-target=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -march=gfx942 -fopenmp-version=52 -O2 repro.c -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
CCE 21.0.3, MI300A unified
module load cce/21.0.3 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm/7.2.0 module unload cray-mpich craycc -fopenmp -fopenmp-targets=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -Xopenmp-target=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -march=gfx942 -fopenmp-version=52 -O2 repro.c -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
CCE 21.0.4, MI300A unified
module load cce/21.0.4 craype-accel-amd-gfx942 rocm/7.2.0 module unload cray-mpich craycc -fopenmp -fopenmp-targets=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -Xopenmp-target=amdgcn-amd-amdhsa -march=gfx942 -fopenmp-version=52 -O2 repro.c -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
AFAR 24.3.0, MI300A unified (runs correctly)
$AFAR/bin/amdclang -fopenmp --offload-arch=gfx942 -fopenmp-version=52 -fopenmp-version=52 -O2 repro.c -o repro HSA_XNACK=1 OMP_TARGET_OFFLOAD=mandatory ./repro
Program (75 lines)
// # Draft finding: omp52-c-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size on cce19
//
// - compiler: cce19
// - toolchain: cce19; arch: gfx942; machine: tuolumne; memory mode: unified; opt: -O2
// - program: catalog omp52-c-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size (c, version 52, sha256 47094ef1ef5dfbfa)
// - expected: check=pass (trusted; derivation + model)
// - actual: wrong_answer check=fail (check_fail: ran_on_host=0 check=fail)
// - verdict: compiler_bug by rule R20-runtime-bug: a legal program fails at run time, deterministically, against an expected value from two or more independent sources with an executed witness, and another toolchain, mode, arch or the elision gives the expected value
// - reason: expected trusted check=pass (derivation + model): derivation + model agree; witnesses: afar/gfx942/unified, cce19/gfx942/unified (port:omp52-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size), cce20/gfx942/unified (port:omp52-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size), cce21/gfx942/unified (port:omp52-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size)
// - citations: RUL-DERIVED-NEEDS-EXECUTION (rulings.md); RUL-WITNESS-PER-MODE (rulings.md); RUL-SAME-COMPILER-RUNS (rulings.md)
// - legality: legal (legal by construction: offload.engine.gen / c_gen / acc_gen check every program against the catalog rules and the offload scope as it is built (no compiler))
// - witnesses: afar/gfx942/unified, cce19/gfx942/unified (port:omp52-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size), cce20/gfx942/unified (port:omp52-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size), cce21/gfx942/unified (port:omp52-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size)
// - withdrawn: none
//
// Generated by compliance.c_gen (OpenMP 5.2, C11): the C port (offload.engine.f2c) of omp52-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size. Do not edit.
// id: omp52-c-clause-dist_schedule-chunk_size
// primary atom: omp.clause.dist_schedule.chunk_size
// legal: yes
// observable: yes
// ran_on_host: inside the target region of interest
// evidence: construct
// needs: none
// std: c11
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <omp.h>
enum { n = 64 };
int main(void) {
int a[n];
int b[n];
int ref[n];
int host_flag;
bool ok;
int team[n];
int nt;
bool dok;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
a[i - 1] = i;
b[i - 1] = 0;
ref[i - 1] = 2 * i + 1;
}
host_flag = 1;
for (int k1_ = 0; k1_ < n; k1_++)
team[k1_] = -1;
nt = -1;
#pragma omp target teams distribute parallel for map(to: a) map(from: b) map(from: team, nt) \
map(tofrom: host_flag) default(none) shared(a, b, team, nt, host_flag) num_teams(4) \
dist_schedule(static, 4)
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
b[i - 1] = 2 * a[i - 1] + 1;
team[i - 1] = omp_get_team_num();
if (i == 1) nt = omp_get_num_teams();
if (i == 1) host_flag = (omp_is_initial_device() ? 1 : 0);
}
dok = true;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
dok = dok && (team[i - 1] == ((i - 1) / 4 % nt));
}
bool t2_ = true;
for (int k3_ = 0; k3_ < n; k3_++)
t2_ = t2_ && (b[k3_] == ref[k3_]);
ok = t2_ && (nt >= 1) && dok;
printf("RESULT ran_on_host=%d check=%s\n", host_flag, ok ? "pass" : "fail");
return 0;
}
// spec (requirement): With a chunk_size, dist_schedule divides the iterations into chunks of that size.
// "If the chunk_size argument is specified, iterations are divided into chunks of size chunk_size." (5.2 §11.6.1
// p.256 l.18-19)
// spec (requirement): The chunks are assigned to the initial teams of the league round-robin in team-number order.
// "These chunks are assigned to the initial teams of the league in a round-robin fashion in the order of the initial
// team number." (5.2 §11.6.1 p.256 l.23-24)
// spec (this program): dist_schedule(static, 4) with num_teams(4) puts iterations 1-4 on team 0, 5-8 on team 1, and
// so on, round robin; craycc places every iteration on team 0.
Something to add? Dispute its legality · Report it fixed in a newer release · Report a mistake on this page
Expected and observed
Expected
check=pass
Observed where it behaves incorrectly
RESULT ran_on_host=0 check=fail
What the specification requires
The specification text this program relies on and the compiler is expected to support.
OpenMP 5.2 §11.6.1 p.256 l.18-19
If the chunk_size argument is specified, iterations are divided into chunks of size chunk_size.
OpenMP 5.2 §11.6.1 p.256 l.23-24
These chunks are assigned to the initial teams of the league in a round-robin fashion in the order of the initial team number.
Evidence
Same compiler, one change
- num_teams(1) instead of num_teams(4) (every chunk on team 0): AFAR 24.3.0: correct; CCE 19.0.0: correct; CCE 20.0.2: correct; CCE 21.0.3: correct; CCE 21.0.4: correct
Control program
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h> #include <omp.h> enum { n = 64 }; int main(void) { int a[n]; int b[n]; int ref[n]; int host_flag; bool ok; int team[n]; int nt; bool dok; for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { a[i - 1] = i; b[i - 1] = 0; ref[i - 1] = 2 * i + 1; } host_flag = 1; for (int k1_ = 0; k1_ < n; k1_++) team[k1_] = -1; nt = -1; #pragma omp target teams distribute parallel for map(to: a) map(from: b) map(from: team, nt) \ map(tofrom: host_flag) default(none) shared(a, b, team, nt, host_flag) num_teams(1) \ dist_schedule(static, 4) for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { b[i - 1] = 2 * a[i - 1] + 1; team[i - 1] = omp_get_team_num(); if (i == 1) nt = omp_get_num_teams(); if (i == 1) host_flag = (omp_is_initial_device() ? 1 : 0); } dok = true; for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { dok = dok && (team[i - 1] == ((i - 1) / 4 % nt)); } bool t2_ = true; for (int k3_ = 0; k3_ < n; k3_++) t2_ = t2_ && (b[k3_] == ref[k3_]); ok = t2_ && (nt >= 1) && dok; printf("RESULT ran_on_host=%d check=%s\n", host_flag, ok ? "pass" : "fail"); return 0; }
Other compilers run it correctly
AFAR 24.3.0, GCC 16.2.0